Ptrace attach or cross-process memory write on Linux
Matches the two syscalls that carry ptrace-based process injection's actual memory-write primitives: `ptrace`, which covers both the `PTRACE_ATTACH`/ `PTRACE_SEIZE` step and the `PTRACE_POKETEXT`/`PTRACE_POKEDATA`/`PTRACE_SETREGS` calls AN0579 names, and `process_vm_writev`, the newer cross-process memory API that debuggers and injection tooling increasingly use instead of poke-based ptrace because it moves more data per call. `mmap`, the third syscall the brief's logsource note lists, is deliberately left out: every process calls it continually as part of ordinary memory allocation and dynamic linking, so gating on it would make the selection effectively always-true rather than a signal. What this cannot express: AN0579's `TargetProcessNameFilter`, `UserContextMismatch` and `ProcessRelationshipConstraint` knobs all require knowing which process was ptraced and comparing its identity, UID or parent relationship to the tracer's — that identity lives in the syscall's `a1` argument (the target PID) and would need a join against a process table to resolve, which a single auditd SYSCALL record cannot supply. The specific ptrace request (`PTRACE_POKEDATA` vs. read-only `PTRACE_PEEKTEXT` vs. plain `PTRACE_ATTACH`) sits in `a0` as a raw integer that this rule does not decode, so a benign `strace -p` attach and an actual poke-based injection produce the same match. MITRE's `TimeWindowBetweenPtraceAndMemoryWrite` knob is a two-event correlation lib/sigma has no timeframe construct for. The brief's other two logsources are not attempted: `linux:osquery` has no standardised Sigma field vocabulary in this corpus (the same reason `macos:unifiedlog` was skipped for T1027.015's AN0784 — inventing field names would render in four backends and match nothing), and the `process_creation` execve logsource would only see the debugger binary being launched, which is a strictly weaker signal than the syscalls it goes on to make. Prerequisite: neither syscall is audited by default on any major distribution. This rule returns zero rows — meaning blind, not quiet — until a rule such as `-a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S ptrace -S process_vm_writev -k ptrace_inject` is loaded. Second prerequisite specific to the `syscall` field: raw, uninterpreted auditd output records `syscall=` as the architecture-dependent kernel syscall number (`ptrace` is 101 and `process_vm_writev` is 311 on x86_64; both differ on arm64), not the name string this selection matches against. Name resolution is not universal — Elastic's Auditbeat resolves it by default, but a plain-text `audit.log` tail, `ausearch` without `-i`, and Wazuh's default auditd field extraction all pass the number through unresolved, so on those collectors this selection never fires until an interpreting layer (`ausearch -i`, `laurel`, or an equivalent enrichment pipeline) sits in front of it. UNVERIFIED AS AUTHORED — derived from MITRE ATT&CK DET0203, not hand-written and not tested by its author. Any lab result is on this rule's own page.Full descriptionShow less
The detection
The 3 SIEM queries below are previews produced by Siemphony’s own translator, not pySigma, and none has been executed against a real backend — review before you deploy.
detection.yml
Splunk · SPL
Run this as a search.
index=* ((type="SYSCALL" AND syscall="ptrace") OR (type="SYSCALL" AND syscall="process_vm_writev"))Elastic · ES|QL
Run this as a search.
FROM logs-*| WHERE ((TO_LOWER(type) == "syscall" AND TO_LOWER(syscall) == "ptrace") OR (TO_LOWER(type) == "syscall" AND TO_LOWER(syscall) == "process_vm_writev"))
Wazuh · XML rule
Deploy to your manager — this is a rule, not a search.
<group name="sigma,linux,"> <!-- Rule ids must be unique on your manager; 100000+ is the user range. --> <!-- 2 rules: the Sigma condition ORs across different fields, which one rule cannot express. Any one matching is a hit. --> <rule id="100000" level="5"> <!-- Set <if_sid> to the decoder/base rule for linux so this only evaluates relevant events. --> <field name="type" type="pcre2">(?i)^SYSCALL$</field> <field name="syscall" type="pcre2">(?i)^ptrace$</field> <description>Ptrace attach or cross-process memory write on Linux (1/2)</description> <mitre> <id>T1055.008</id> </mitre> </rule> <rule id="100001" level="5"> <!-- Set <if_sid> to the decoder/base rule for linux so this only evaluates relevant events. --> <field name="type" type="pcre2">(?i)^SYSCALL$</field> <field name="syscall" type="pcre2">(?i)^process_vm_writev$</field> <description>Ptrace attach or cross-process memory write on Linux (2/2)</description> <mitre> <id>T1055.008</id> </mitre> </rule></group>
Sentinel · KQL
Run this as a search.
Sentinel cannot express this construct. No Sentinel table is modelled for this logsource ({"product":"linux","service":"auditd"}), so there is nothing honest to query. Pick a logsource this translator maps, or write the KQL by hand. The Sigma source is on the first tab, unchanged.
Verdicts · reactions · comments
Community
Verdicts from engineers who actually deployed it, and the conversation around it.
Nobody has run this in a real environment and said what happened.
Verdicts from engineers who deployed it
0 castNo verdicts reported yet. The first one is worth more than the tenth — say what you ran it against.
Log in to report a verdict.
Log in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Someone who deploys this will have something to say about it.