Skip to content

Siemphony is in beta and still being built. What ships today, and what does not.

Siemphony’s repertoire

Ptrace attach or cross-process memory write on Linux

Siemphony@siemphonylowT1055.008unverified
Matches the two syscalls that carry ptrace-based process injection's actual memory-write primitives: `ptrace`, which covers both the `PTRACE_ATTACH`/ `PTRACE_SEIZE` step and the `PTRACE_POKETEXT`/`PTRACE_POKEDATA`/`PTRACE_SETREGS` calls AN0579 names, and `process_vm_writev`, the newer cross-process memory API that debuggers and injection tooling increasingly use instead of poke-based ptrace because it moves more data per call. `mmap`, the third syscall the brief's logsource note lists, is deliberately left out: every process calls it continually as part of ordinary memory allocation and dynamic linking, so gating on it would make the selection effectively always-true rather than a signal. What this cannot express: AN0579's `TargetProcessNameFilter`, `UserContextMismatch` and `ProcessRelationshipConstraint` knobs all require knowing which process was ptraced and comparing its identity, UID or parent relationship to the tracer's — that identity lives in the syscall's `a1` argument (the target PID) and would need a join against a process table to resolve, which a single auditd SYSCALL record cannot supply. The specific ptrace request (`PTRACE_POKEDATA` vs. read-only `PTRACE_PEEKTEXT` vs. plain `PTRACE_ATTACH`) sits in `a0` as a raw integer that this rule does not decode, so a benign `strace -p` attach and an actual poke-based injection produce the same match. MITRE's `TimeWindowBetweenPtraceAndMemoryWrite` knob is a two-event correlation lib/sigma has no timeframe construct for. The brief's other two logsources are not attempted: `linux:osquery` has no standardised Sigma field vocabulary in this corpus (the same reason `macos:unifiedlog` was skipped for T1027.015's AN0784 — inventing field names would render in four backends and match nothing), and the `process_creation` execve logsource would only see the debugger binary being launched, which is a strictly weaker signal than the syscalls it goes on to make. Prerequisite: neither syscall is audited by default on any major distribution. This rule returns zero rows — meaning blind, not quiet — until a rule such as `-a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S ptrace -S process_vm_writev -k ptrace_inject` is loaded. Second prerequisite specific to the `syscall` field: raw, uninterpreted auditd output records `syscall=` as the architecture-dependent kernel syscall number (`ptrace` is 101 and `process_vm_writev` is 311 on x86_64; both differ on arm64), not the name string this selection matches against. Name resolution is not universal — Elastic's Auditbeat resolves it by default, but a plain-text `audit.log` tail, `ausearch` without `-i`, and Wazuh's default auditd field extraction all pass the number through unresolved, so on those collectors this selection never fires until an interpreting layer (`ausearch -i`, `laurel`, or an equivalent enrichment pipeline) sits in front of it. UNVERIFIED AS AUTHORED — derived from MITRE ATT&CK DET0203, not hand-written and not tested by its author. Any lab result is on this rule's own page.Full description

The detection

The 3 SIEM queries below are previews produced by Siemphony’s own translator, not pySigma, and none has been executed against a real backend — review before you deploy.

detection.yml

Splunk · SPL

Run this as a search.

index=* ((type="SYSCALL" AND syscall="ptrace") OR (type="SYSCALL" AND syscall="process_vm_writev"))

Elastic · ES|QL

Run this as a search.

FROM logs-*| WHERE ((TO_LOWER(type) == "syscall" AND TO_LOWER(syscall) == "ptrace") OR (TO_LOWER(type) == "syscall" AND TO_LOWER(syscall) == "process_vm_writev"))

Wazuh · XML rule

Deploy to your manager — this is a rule, not a search.

<group name="sigma,linux,">  <!-- Rule ids must be unique on your manager; 100000+ is the user range. -->  <!-- 2 rules: the Sigma condition ORs across different fields,       which one rule cannot express. Any one matching is a hit. -->  <rule id="100000" level="5">    <!-- Set <if_sid> to the decoder/base rule for linux so this only evaluates relevant events. -->    <field name="type" type="pcre2">(?i)^SYSCALL$</field>    <field name="syscall" type="pcre2">(?i)^ptrace$</field>    <description>Ptrace attach or cross-process memory write on Linux (1/2)</description>    <mitre>      <id>T1055.008</id>    </mitre>  </rule>   <rule id="100001" level="5">    <!-- Set <if_sid> to the decoder/base rule for linux so this only evaluates relevant events. -->    <field name="type" type="pcre2">(?i)^SYSCALL$</field>    <field name="syscall" type="pcre2">(?i)^process_vm_writev$</field>    <description>Ptrace attach or cross-process memory write on Linux (2/2)</description>    <mitre>      <id>T1055.008</id>    </mitre>  </rule></group>

Sentinel · KQL

Run this as a search.

Sentinel cannot express this construct. No Sentinel table is modelled for this logsource ({"product":"linux","service":"auditd"}), so there is nothing honest to query. Pick a logsource this translator maps, or write the KQL by hand. The Sigma source is on the first tab, unchanged.

Verdicts · reactions · comments

Community

Verdicts from engineers who actually deployed it, and the conversation around it.

Log in to react
Not yet reported on

Nobody has run this in a real environment and said what happened.

Verdicts from engineers who deployed it

0 cast

No verdicts reported yet. The first one is worth more than the tenth — say what you ran it against.

Log in to report a verdict.

Log in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Someone who deploys this will have something to say about it.