Skip to content

Siemphony is in beta and still being built. What ships today, and what does not.

Siemphony’s repertoire

Wireless network association event recorded on a Windows host

Siemphony@siemphonyinformationalT1669unverified
Matches Microsoft-Windows-WLAN-AutoConfig EventIDs 8001-8003, AN1476's association/authentication-event bucket. MITRE's actual discriminators — an unexpected SSID, a location outside the geofence, or a device that should have no Wi-Fi at all — live in the KnownSSIDList and GeoLocationContext knobs, site-specific baselines with no field in this channel to hold them, so the rule can only confirm an association attempt happened. It is written anyway because dual-homed bridging, the mechanism MITRE names for hopping onto a target's Wi-Fi from a wired host, shows up here as a wireless association on a machine not expected to have one — a fact only the deploying analyst's host inventory can supply. UNVERIFIED — derived from MITRE ATT&CK DET0536 and never executed against logs.Full description

The detection

The 4 SIEM queries below are previews produced by Siemphony’s own translator, not pySigma, and none has been executed against a real backend — review before you deploy.

detection.yml

Sentinel · KQL

Run this as a search.

Event| where (EventID == 8001 or EventID == 8002 or EventID == 8003)

Splunk · SPL

Run this as a search.

index=* (EventID="8001" OR EventID="8002" OR EventID="8003")

Elastic · ES|QL

Run this as a search.

FROM logs-*| WHERE (event.code == 8001 OR event.code == 8002 OR event.code == 8003)

Wazuh · XML rule

Deploy to your manager — this is a rule, not a search.

<group name="sigma,windows,">  <!-- Rule ids must be unique on your manager; 100000+ is the user range. -->  <rule id="100000" level="3">    <!-- Set <if_sid> to the decoder/base rule for windows so this only evaluates relevant events. -->    <field name="EventID" type="pcre2">(?i)(^8001$|^8002$|^8003$)</field>    <description>Wireless network association event recorded on a Windows host</description>    <mitre>      <id>T1669</id>    </mitre>  </rule></group>

Verdicts · reactions · comments

Community

Verdicts from engineers who actually deployed it, and the conversation around it.

Log in to react
Not yet reported on

Nobody has run this in a real environment and said what happened.

Verdicts from engineers who deployed it

0 cast

No verdicts reported yet. The first one is worth more than the tenth — say what you ran it against.

Log in to report a verdict.

Log in to join the discussion.

No comments yet. Someone who deploys this will have something to say about it.